In other words, communication will be key to future EPP vendor success. In response, Gartner predicts that the leading and visionary vendors of 20 will be those that will use their data to provide actionable advice to their clients. Gartner found that clients that suffered an attack last year felt let down by their endpoint vendors or that the service provided by their vendor left them dangling. This has resulted in a market that can appear on the surface to have problems with carving out individual identities.ĮPP is also a market under serious scrutiny after the seemingly higher-than-average wave of attacks in 2017. The EPP marketplace is one of high pressure and continuous evolution- an evolution that appears to be speeding up as customer demands increase in response to a plethora of attacks.įor example, EDR and EPP solutions continue to blur the lines between them solutions that were traditionally one or the other have begun taking on the capabilities of their counterpart. On the other hand, the new criteria allowed entry to four new vendors: Cisco, Endgame, Fortinet, and FireEye. Most of them appear to lack a North American presence as well. According to Gartner’s report, this is because they focused on a single segment to the detriment of others. Therefore, sometimes vendors who appeared in the MQ one year may not return for the next one.įour vendors-360 Enterprise Security Group, AhnLab, G Data Software, and Webroot-appeared in the 2017 MQ but did not make the cut for 2018. Gartner readjusts its evaluation criteria, often in response to market changes, each year. 2018: A Year of New Names and Vanished Vendors
Additionally, the vendor must be capable of supporting a 10,000 seat enterprise and have some North American presence. To be considered for entry to the EPP MQ, a vendor’s solution must be capable of blocking known and unknown file-based malware, detecting malicious program behaviors, and automatically quarantining rogue programs. The former considers the incorporation of EDR (endpoint detection and response) features as central necessities whereas the latter considered them only as welcome supplements. This new definition contrasts somewhat with the 2017 definition. Before diving into the subject overall, it is important to clarify exactly what the category means to Gartner.įor 2018, Gartner defines an EPP as “solution deployed on endpoint devices to prevent file-based malware, to detect and block malicious activity from trusted and untrusted applications, and to provide the investigation and remediation capabilities needed to dynamically respond to security incidents and alerts.” Gartner has somewhat altered their definition of an EPP since September of last year. Here they are: How Gartner Defines Endpoint Protection Platforms Gartner’s latest prediction is that EPP will provide automated, orchestrated incident investigation and responses by 2021.Īt Solutions Review, we read the Endpoint Protection Platforms Magic Quadrant report and pulled a few of what we considered the most important takeaways since the 2017 EPP MQ. In 2018, adaption and security architecture evolution dominates the field’s collective thinking. The 2018 EPP MQ is the 11th iteration of the report Gartner first introduced the category in 2007. This year the 21 vendors selected to the Endpoint Protection Platform Magic Quadrant are: Bitdefender, Carbon Black, Cisco, Comodo, CrowdStrike, Cylance, Endgame, ESET, FireEye, Fortinet, F-Secure, Kaspersky Lab, Malwarebytes, McAfee, Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Panda Security, Sentinel One, Sophos, Symantec, and Trend Micro. The four categories of the Quadrant are labeled Leaders, Visionaries, Challengers, or Niche Players. The report then provides readers with a graph-the so-called Magic Quadrant-plotting the vendors based on the completeness of, and their ability to execute on their security vision. You can read the 2019 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms here.įor the uninitiated, in this report, Gartner evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the 21 Endpoint Protection Platform vendors that it considers the most significant in the market based on distinct service and market share criteria. has released the annual iteration of their Magic Quadrant (MQ) Report for Endpoint Protection Protection Platforms (EPP) for 2018. It’s that time of year again: technology research and analysis firm Gartner, Inc. The moves somewhat call into question whether EDR and EPP are blurring together as Gartner claims or if EDR is actually supplanting traditional EPP because of the data breach distrust explored in their report.
#Malwarebytes endpoint protection for mac update#
(Editor’s Note: Since we first published this evaluation of the 2018 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms, we’ve seen vendors update their EDR capabilities via technological innovations or through acquisitions.
0 kommentar(er)
